Labels:book | reckoner | sky | tree | windowpane OCR: 34 statute explaining that the provision "was never in- tended to enable discontented litigant to oust judge because of adverse rulings made, for such rulings are reviewable otherwise. 230 U.S. Simil larly Berger United Stotes, 255 31 the Court observed that uthe bias or pre udice which can pat.m against judge must be based upor something other than rulings in the case T be sure the Court has not had occasion to con- sider whether the sarc principle applies with cqual force in cases arising under Section 455 a). There H ne reason t believe, however, that the principle annou inced 1n Berger and American Steel Barrel rests on the particular language of Scction 144 rather than on the commonsense notion that judge's adverse rulings simply do not give rise to rcasonable infer- ence bias. unders ...
(.png)
